Well......without turning this into a supercharger debate how about we talk good points/bad points.
Ok, so, I think that most everyone agrees there's hardly anything more beautiful than a big *** roots blower sticking out of a hood or hatch all polished and shiny.
Drawback: 1930's technology, 50-55% adiabatic efficency.
Whipple: Looks great, gobbs of power, great tech support.
Drawback: a little on the pricey side, availability these days is questionable, around 60-65% adiabatic efficency. Torque curve is flat so it's hard to "baby" it and that's why you hear alot of guys talk about it being hard on the drive and breaking them.
ProCharger: Looks good, progressive torque curve, makes lots of power. It is possible to be close to 75% adiabatic efficency. Can run more boost on same engine than above systems. Dollar for dollar you can make more power with a ProCharger.
Drawback: Poor tech support. You must have mechanical ability to install yourself. Fuel injection has limited power options because of pump pressures needed and fuel injector flows. For carb'd systems you really need a good carb guy to modify your carbs.
Now, to answer your question directly; I'm on my 3rd ProCharger motor. Started with a 600hp, then went to 900hp then went 1200hp.
Out of the 3 only the 900hp was a basic direct bolt on. Even then I had to make my own intercooler bracket. And NO! none of them blew up or ever had any damage. All 3 motors are still running. (the 1st nat.asp. now)
Again the reason being, dollar for dollar it was cheaper, for me anyway.
DAVE