Powerboat Forums at SpeedWake banner
1 - 20 of 30 Posts

quick22

· Registered
Joined
·
43 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
Hey guys, I know you have been asked this question a thousand times but I am at a loss. I have had this 87 Pachanga 22 for over ten years and have been chasing the speed barrier ever since. I have a 502 crate fitted up now with a Bravo1. the motor started as a 450 horse crate motor but since its first couple of years I have rollered it with the 232/242 cam and roller rockers. Shaved and unshrouded pocket ported the orig. rect heads. I still cannot get this beast above 75mph.I am using the original Tbolt IV ignition. I have a hydromotive 22inch 4 blade. This year I added Dart Iron eagles with mild port job and beehive springs. and still 75 mph. The boat runs beautifully and strong but acts like something is holding it back?? Im running a Holley 950 hp dblpmpr which I added at the end of last year. (proform mainbody w/ 850 meters and bowles. Im about to change ignition fearing a limit to this ingnition. My WOT is now 5200 +- Help!!
 
Welcome to SW!

Sounds like you have plenty of power. Have you ever held a straight edge up to your bottom? Take a 4' level and hold it up to the last 4' of you hull. You probably have a hook that was purposely added to the bottom. It's like putting your tabs down. It lowers your RPM.

Those boats were never intended to run 75+.
 
Discussion starter · #3 ·
I realize that this boat originally had 65mph in mind and I also realize that I am riding in dangerous territory but that is part of the thrill. It still doesn't tell me whats limiting the top end. The bottom edge of the transom flares in two small places towards the water, creating natural trim tabs.(part of the design) This shouldnt be enough to slow it that much.
 
quick22 said:
I realize that this boat originally had 65mph in mind and I also realize that I am riding in dangerous territory but that is part of the thrill. It still doesn't tell me whats limiting the top end. The bottom edge of the transom flares in two small places towards the water, creating natural trim tabs.(part of the design) This shouldnt be enough to slow it that much.
Those wedges in the hull play hell on higher speeds! I bet that has ALOT to do with the wall your hitting in top speed.. The 272 formulas have it too, and it is very hard to get much past 70 in these things.. you can throw tons of HP at them, and only get a bit more speed..

You can have a good fiberglass shop grind out, and smooth the hull to get rid of those factory wedges, but im sure you'll get negative effects at lower speeds...

Ron
 
eyeinstine said:
Those wedges in the hull play hell on higher speeds! I bet that has ALOT to do with the wall your hitting in top speed.. The 272 formulas have it too, and it is very hard to get much past 70 in these things.. you can throw tons of HP at them, and only get a bit more speed..

You can have a good fiberglass shop grind out, and smooth the hull to get rid of those factory wedges, but im sure you'll get negative effects at lower speeds...

Ron
At higher speeds there isn't enough of those "wedges" in the water to worry about :)(see illustration) Since the boat is an '87 , my bet is you have a low X dimension and are dragging a lot of outdrive in the water. A guy on here from Canada with a 242 Formula raised his 3" and picked up 5 to 6 mph if I remember correctly.
 

Attachments

Mopower said:
At higher speeds there isn't enough of those "wedges" in the water to worry about :)(see illistartion) Since the boat is an '87 , my bet is you have a low X dimension and are dragging a lot of outdrive in the water. A guy on here from Canada raised his 3" and picked up 5 to 6 mph if I remember correctly.
Well, i guess once you have :) enough ;) power, and can motor past that point and get the whole boat out of the water, then they wont be an issue.. :laugher: :laugher:

nice pic Cal!! What props you running now???

Ron
 
Discussion starter · #9 ·
I thought the X factor on these boats was pretty decent. It originally had a Alpha w/a 454 mag. you can trim it up to a chine walk but the platue still seems to be there. I should be running an easy 550 horses what gives??
 
Most late 80s boats still had the cavitation plate at the bottom of the boat. Now days its an inch or two (or more) above the bottom. My cuz has an 05 Fountain and his prop shafts are even with the bottom :eek: :eek:
BUT it also takes him half a mile to get on plane :(

I only wish "shortys" were in my budget :(
 
Mopower said:
Right now 26 Bravos at 5700 rpms :D I can also run 28s or 30s. Speed stays about the same just cruise speed increases.
Nice! Why not run the bigger props for the better cruise then?? and lower the RPMS.. Or will RPMS be below max HP rpm?

Got any 24 bravos laying around i can try? :D

Ron
 
quick22 said:
Mo, what kind of power do you think it would take to overcome that x factor?A LOT OF POWER Or how much are the shorty drives? Just the lower half right?
Lower half is all you need and last I've heard about $2400. although deals can be had.
Problem is I need two :(
 
eyeinstine said:
Biatch!
:laugher: :laugher: :laugher:

So far the 25 Mirages are the best for me, getting 41-42 mph cruise @ 3000 rpms.. :eek: :eek:
Thats what mine did too with 454s and 25 Mirages. The 28s get me near 50 and the 26s about 47mph. Yet with the 26s over 5500 rpm the engines take on a whole new sound. Much less labored...they kind of quiet down and just spin. They dynoed 647 @ 5700
 
Believe me Quick , this has driven me (and my engine builder) nuts for a couple of years. A guy from the Caymen Islands also has a 272 Formula with blown 454s about 600 hp each. He has shortys on his and is claiming 93 mpg :rolleyes:
 
1 - 20 of 30 Posts